In this extensive and eye-opening article, we delve deep into the complex network of organizations that are essential in certifying the quality and standards of aircraft around the world while shedding light on critical issues within the aerospace manufacturing sector. Guberman’s address stemmed from his extensive experience as a quality professional spanning over 40 years, during which he has been involved in various industries, including aerospace, medical implants, printing, and plastic distribution. Daryl Guberman solemnly swears that everything presented in this article is true and accurate as of February 1st, 2024. This article is base on the video here: https://youtu.be/nbQD2oBoHMQ
Who Is Responsible For Manufacturing Quality: QA Expert Daryl Guberman Explains https://londondailypost.com/who-is-responsible-for-manufacturing-quality-qa-expert-daryl-guberman-explains/
In the article, Daryl Guberman, a QA expert, discusses the alarming discovery of misdrilled holes on 50 undelivered 737 Max Jets. He warns that there may be more such incidents to come, raising serious concerns about Boeing’s manufacturing practices. Addressing Mr. Stan Deal’s chief executive of Boeing’s commercial plane unit assertion that Boeing must maintain discipline within its operations and hold suppliers to high standards, https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/boeing-discovers-misdrilled-holes-50-undelivered-737-max-jets Guberman questions the company’s decision in 2002-Present to delegate source quality inspection to a mere piece of paper – the AS9100 certificate https://www.boeingsuppliers.com/supplier/BQMS_Bulletin-BQMS_CRB_and_Survey-July_2002.pdf . He emphasizes the need for accountability within Boeing’s leadership, particularly regarding the recent directive to a major supplier to hold shipments until all jobs are completed to specification. Furthermore, Guberman highlights the regulatory authority granted to Boeing by the FAA in 2009 to present https://www.pogo.org/analysis/how-the-faa-ceded-aviation-safety-oversight-to-boeing , emphasizing the importance of active leadership engagement in maintaining quality standards. He urges CEOs like David Calhoun to lead by example, rolling up their sleeves and actively championing quality initiatives on the factory floor. Guberman stresses on the importance of hands-on leadership and accountability in upholding quality standards within aerospace manufacturing. By fostering a culture of active engagement and prioritizing quality over bureaucratic processes, companies like Boeing can ensure the safety and reliability of their products.
The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) is a private, not-for-profit, non-governmental corporation that has both federal agencies and corporations on board. With a history spanning over a century, its significance in setting standards cannot be overstated. From 2009-2015, Randy Doughtery held the position of vice president at ANAB- ASQ (American National Accreditation Board) (ASQ is the American Society for Quality), concurrently serving as chairman of the International Accreditation Forum (IAF). The IAF, incorporated in Delaware, serves as a repository for international and national accreditation bodies. Randy’s role as ANSI-ASQ VP and Chairman and principal on the IAF 990 tax form granted him significant control. Randy handed over leadership to Xiao Jianhua 2015-2021, a communist Chinese national. Xiao, with a background in quality involved in USA & world affairs dating back to 1994, also held the position of chief executive at the China National Accreditation Service (CNAS-which is equivalent to ANSI-ANAB accreditation) for Conformity Assessment. Notably, this service certified the laboratory in Wuhan, China, known for its controversial bio-level 4 lab. During Xiao’s tenure, concerns arose regarding the training and protocols within the Wuhan lab https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2021/03/08/josh-rogin-chaos-under-heaven-wuhan-lab-book-excerpt-474322. In a 2019 CDC Volume 25, Number 5—May 2019 training document for virology labs, the only lab mentioned was the Wuhan lab https://www.issuewire.com/daryl-guberman-exposes-ansi-anab-wuhan-bio-level-4forensic-other-laboratory-certification-scheme-1779975140553573 , raising eyebrows also in the training https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/25/5/18-0220_article It states the lab technicians must be highly trained. Pamela Sale, Vice President of Quality for Laboratory Accreditation ANSI-ANAB, acknowledged in a deposition that protocols varied significantly between laboratories, hinting at potential gaps in safety measures https://www.austinmonitor.com/stories/2017/09/austins-crime-lab-failure-points-national-crisis/ . Pamela’s admission fuels speculation about the release of the coronavirus from the Wuhan lab in 2019, underscoring the importance of robust protocols and training in maintaining laboratory safety standards.
At an event hosted by the American Society for Quality ASQ, Daryl Guberman gave a speech to the New Haven and Fairfield County divisions. During this time, David Levy, who was the Region 3 director, was present. It’s important to note that the American Society for Quality had a stake in two accreditation organizations: ANSI and ANAB. ANAB was partially owned 50% by the American Society for Quality, while ANSI owned 50% of ANAB as well. At this event, David Levy expressed support for Daryl Guberman’s initiatives, claiming that ANAB backed his efforts in quality certification and issuance by his companies GUBERMAN-PMC, LLC & G-PMC,LLC of ISO certifications . However, in 2016, Randy Doughtery now technical advisor and still principal on IAF 990 tax form, facing scrutiny due to Guberman’s UTube Channel over his leadership decisions, reached out to Daryl Guberman via email. Randy Doughtery presented an invitation, suggesting that Daryl Guberman join either ANAB or the International Accreditation Forum (IAF is incorporated in Delaware), or both. This proposal raised concerns for Daryl Guberman as it involved joining organizations that were compromised due to their ties with the communist Chinese. Specifically, Randy Doughtery’s handing over control of the IAF to a Chinese national 2015-2021 with ties to the Chinese National Intelligence law article number 7 which mandated to take your data, raised red flags regarding data security and integrity. This individual, Xiao Jianhua, also held a significant position in the CNAS, which had accreditation status equivalent to ANSI- ANAB. It’s worth noting that ANSI-ANAB acted as an underwriter for both the IAF and the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC). This means as an underwriter ANSI-ANAB are legally responsible to system and product failure. Given the ethical implications of aligning with organizations that may be influenced by external factors, Daryl Guberman faced a moral dilemma regarding these affiliations and rejected the offer. Furthermore, revelations from Pamela Sale’s deposition on laboratory accreditation highlighted the need for scrutiny and discernment when considering organizational partnerships.
Miss Pamela, who is Vice President of Quality, was giving her deposition in Texas concerning laboratory issues. She addressed the issue of standards at forensic labs, which Guberman said effects bio-level 4 labs, and labs worldwide, highlighting Sales basic admission to the lack of commonly agreed-upon standards and the prevalence of informal guidelines. This acknowledgment confirms that the laboratory function was out of control, which contributed to the probable escape of the Coronavirus. The revelation prompted scrutiny of A2LA, a laboratory accreditation body that many federal agencies use that sits on ANSI’s board and overlaps with ANAB (2018 ANSI took over complete control of ANAB https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ansi-acquires-full-ownership-of-anab-enhancing-accreditation-services-portfolio-across-global-market-300760006.html ), which also accredits laboratories. A video made by Guberman exposing this situation led to a response from Miss Ashley Morton of A2LA, emphasizing that A2LA and ANSI are separate bodies.
However, Mr. Russ Chaney’s response to this revelation and raised further questions. As Chairman of ANSI, his statement carried weight within the organization, he abused Guberman in a voicemail that was recorded https://youtube.com/shorts/DaEhIFcG0J4 Guberman never knew Russ Chaney and visa versa. Guberman wrote a note to Joe Bhatia, the CEO of ANSI, asking for an apology. Joe Bhatia forwarded the request to his attorney. This action highlighted the involvement of board members, all of whom approved by membership federal agencies like the FTC, FBI, CDC, NIH etc. and corporations, like Boeing. Lockheed, GE, Pfizer, in condoning Russ Cheney’s statements. The matter was revisited, and the attorney Jameson Carroll responded to the matter by denying the involvement of Chaney in the recorded interaction. This interaction underscored the importance of leadership’s influence on organizational values and actions.
In 2022, Daryl Guberman applied for the position of director at large at ANSI. He saw this as an opportunity to potentially change their approach. Drawing from his experience in establishing his own business in 2011 as a competitor to the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the American National Accreditation Board (ANAB), he recognized the importance of accreditation in the industry and accreditation competition in the marketplace. He understood the significance attached to ANSI and ANAB accreditations. Believing that his involvement could enhance the quality standards, Daryl Guberman expressed confidence that his dedication and expertise could significantly improve the current state of quality assurance. His application process involved answering nine questions about his potential contributions to ANSI. However, despite receiving 16 commendable recommendations and testimonials highlighting his expertise in aerospace and quality matters, the nomination committee, chaired by Russ Cheney, did not select him for the position.
Daryl Guberman highlighted the interconnectedness within the industry, where organizations like ASQ and ANAB sit on ANSI’s board, influencing quality standards. He pointed out the lack of oversight and confidence in the integrity of certificates issued by ANSI-ANAB and its affiliated registrars. Drawing attention to specific instances, such as Spirit Aeros Systems and Intertek, he questioned the prevalence of substandard quality and emphasized the need for increased accountability and oversight. Furthermore, Daryl Guberman highlighted ANSI’s assumption of complete control over ANAB, raising concerns about the transparency and integrity of the accreditation process. These developments underscored his broader concerns about the state of quality assurance within the industry, urging for greater transparency, accountability, and adherence to stringent quality standards.
In 2018 (ANSI took over complete control of ANAB) but on Boeing’s supplier portal, it still listed ANSI-ASQ, national accreditation board ANAB, or International Equivalent. Boeing’s dedication to quality didn’t prompt them to update this information within a year or even six months. Remarkably, six years later, it still displays this outdated information. It’s worth noting that during the term of Xiao Jianhua Communist National between 2015 and 2021, ANSI-ANAB were sitting on the IAF. Christopher Wray-Director FBI emphasized the importance of vigilance over China, yet during this period, many federal agencies and corporations have gotten hacked. Additionally, since they are members of ANSI-ANAB boards, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/chinese-hackers-breach-federal-governments-personnel-office/2015/06/04/889c0e52-0af7-11e5-95fd-d580f1c5d44e_story.html & https://www.upguard.com/blog/biggest-data-breaches-us it was discovered that Iran and Pakistan were associated with ANSI- ANAB via IAF membership. Iran, which supports Hamas, was involved in recent incidents where three soldiers were killed https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3659809/3-us-service-members-killed-others-injured-in-jordan-following-drone-attack/ . Both countries are equivalent to accreditation to ANSI-ANAB (IAF-MLA-multi-lateral agreement & IAF-MRA-multi-regional agreement). Boeing’s reference to ANSI-ASQ, ANAB or International Equivalent could encompass entities like Iran and Pakistan. It’s essential to understand that ANSI-ANAB are underwriters. Therefore, they bear legal responsibility for any issues arising from the certified systems or products. This is evident in several contracts from the U.S. government, confirming ANSI-ANAB’s role as underwriters for the International Accreditation Forum. Boeing, as a member of ANSI’s board alongside various corporations and federal agencies, is directly involved in these dynamics. Additionally, a bulletin from Boeing in 2002 instructed suppliers with ANAB accreditation for AS9100 to merely submit their certificates without undergoing further inspection by Boeing.
To make matters worse, while David Calhoun Boeing CEO continually emphasizes the FAA role as a regulator, he should have been actively involved on the floor, showing support and enthusiasm due to FAA giving FAA regulatory authority to Boeing in 2009-Present. David Calhoun’s apparent complacency may explain why critical components like rivets are missing. Moreover, the FAA granted Boeing’s commercial airline division increased authority in 2009 to self-certify its own aircraft, allowing Boeing employees to perform tasks on behalf of the FAA, including oversight, testing, product standards, and certification of aircraft technologies and designs. https://www.avweb.com/news/faa-grants-boeing-more-autonomy-on-certification/ This lack of oversight is concerning, especially when considering that both Boeing and the FAA act as regulators. Boeing’s portal still displays ANSI-ASQ national accreditation board indicating a lack of pride in their quality which is evident by 6 years of not upgrading ANSI-ASQ to ANSI-ANAB. Additionally, their call for an “International Equivalent” includes entities like Iran or Pakistan, further raising concerns.
Boeing’s Supplier Portal as seen February 1, 2024 (2018 ANSI-took over ANAB 100% ownership-Boeing has not upgraded supplier portal for 6 years)
https://www.boeingsuppliers.com/supplier/faq.html (2/1/2024)
Furthermore, Boeing employees hold positions of authority within accreditation bodies, despite facing issues with maintaining quality standards within Boeing itself. This is exemplified by instances of Boeing https://www.defense-aerospace.com/falsified-papers-sloppy-work-led-faa-to-fine-boeing/ and Kobe Steel falsifying documentation for their aircraft https://finance.yahoo.com/news/boeing-passenger-jets-falsely-certified-kobe-steel-products-021244749–sector.html . This pattern of behavior raises questions about the integrity of Boeing’s operations. Additionally, there have been recent incidents at their composite facility for Bell Boeing, specifically related to the V22, where documentation regarding heat cycles, pressure, and temperatures of autoclaves for parts was found to be falsified dating back to 2007. This continued for 11 years until 2018, highlighting a concerning lack of oversight https://www.justice.gov/usao-edpa/pr/boeing-pay-81-million-resolve-alleged-false-claims-act-violations-arising-manufacture . The interconnections between Boeing and regulatory bodies like the FAA, the Department of Transportation, and the Society for Automotive Engineers raise further concerns about the integrity of the aerospace industry.
Furthermore, the International Aerospace Quality Group (IAQG), responsible for aircraft quality, has been implicated in questionable practices. For example, the IAQG, along with other entities like SAE and ANAB, developed a procedure for the Oasis Online Aerospace Supplier Information System Heads Up 22. This system allows organizations like Boeing and other aerospace companies to access supplier certification information without on-site inspections. However, the procedure stipulates that refusal to participate in the Oasis database or failure of paying database fees results in the revocation of AS9100 certification, demonstrating coercive tactics rather than a genuine commitment to quality.
In his interactions with businesses, Daryl has encountered a prevalent attitude of compliance with ANSI-ANAB accreditation due to pressure from suppliers and industry peers. However, companies under the GPMC, LLC registration have found success without ANSI-ANAB accreditation and being independently accredited, as evidenced by the direct acceptance of certificates by aerospace, automotive, medical electronics and others. This demonstrates how industry practices and the alleged requirement of ANSI-ANAB accreditation are not connected. Daryl has personally submitted his CV to Boeing, emphasizing his team’s expertise in ensuring quality and safety standards and reducing escapes both at Boeing and their suppliers. He warns that failure to address systemic issues may result in catastrophic consequences, including loss of aircraft and lives. David Calhoun’s affiliation with ANSI-ANAB and apparent disregard for Boeings FAA regulatory designation 2009 to present diminishes the integrity of the organization in Daryl’s view, as evidenced by questionable practices and associations within the aerospace industry.
In conclusion, the aerospace manufacturing sector faces significant challenges in upholding quality standards and ensuring the safety of its products. Addressing these challenges requires a collective effort from industry leaders, regulatory bodies, and quality consultants like Daryl Guberman. “By prioritizing transparency, accountability, and continuous improvement, we can work towards a future where aerospace manufacturing meets the highest standards of quality and safety” Daryl’s final comment was his 2011 saying concerning quality and ISO and AS9100 certification “It is not the certificate that company, it is the management and personnel that makes the certification”
Daryl Guberman can be reached by phone at 203-556-1493 or by email at daryltqrs@yahoo.com for anyone who would like to seek his assistance or discuss possible projects. You can reach out to him personally to benefit from his extensive experience and abundance of knowledge.
Contact Information:
Name: Daryl Guberman
Company: Guberman-PMC, LLC
Address: 1345 Barnum Avenue, Suite 306, Stratford, CT 06614
Telephone: 203-556-1493
YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@darylguberman4242/videos
Email: daryltqrs@yahoo.com
